Liberalphobic.com

A few questions from yesterday’s Congressional investigation of Hillary’s involvement in the Benghazi debacle.

Q: In 2011 your email shows 800 messages regarding Libya. In 2012 that number dropped to 67. Did you lose interest in Libya?
A: “No. I began working off-line. I attended live meetings, used the telephone, and non-email memos.”
NOTE: She just suddenly went old-school and stopped using email for matters of National Security?

Q: Why has noone been disciplined for the tragic lapse in embassy security?
A: “Deisions [regarding discipline] were made…”
NOTE: Those persons who did face discipline remained on the payroll and received all back-pay.

Q: Why did you perpetuate the story about the video?
A: “I believe that video played a role in the attack.”
NOTE: She sent an email to family members saying the attack was planned terrorism and not video related.

Q: You told America the attack was non-terrorist, caused by a video, but you told family that it was a deliberate terrorist attack. Why two different stories?
A: “Everything was happening fast and that’s what people were saying.”
NOTE: She bases decisions on street gossip and she wants the keys to the White House?

Q: It appears you used the events to your political advantage regarding media appearances. Did you?
A: “It was Pres. Obama who insisted media coverage should go to those immediately involved.”

Q: In 2012 there were 600+ requests for added security from Ambassador Stevens to the State Dept. Not one of them made its way to your desk.Yet, for example, you got 180 emails from a personal friend [Blumenthal]. Why?
A: “Amb. Stevens did not have my email address. I do not get involved in security matters.”
NOTE: 4 Americans killed in a preventable event under her oversight and she claims non-involvement? She blames underlings and claims innocence for herself?